ROOM: HAYDON-ALLEN TANK |
STREAM: THE DISCIPLINARY HISTORY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE |
Roger Scott, School of Political Science and International
Studies, University of Queensland
The decline of political science within the study of public administration
The study of government as a unique phenomenon has deep historical
roots and has engaged the attention of philosophers, economists and lawyers
throughout recorded history. Political studies as a separate discipline brought
these pre-existing disciplines into focus. Under American influence, these studies
also came to embrace aspects of human behaviour and to incorporate elements
successively of psychology, social anthropology and sociology. Australian universities
roughly paralleled this trend, with political studies emerging mainly out of
departments of history but closely linked to related studies in law and philosophy.
While "political science" was later to become the dominant title, three of the
older institutions - Sydney, Tasmania and Queensland - adopted the title Government
as the departmental nomenclature. This reflected in part the trend in those
institutions for economists to demonstrate interest in the role of government
and the functioning of governmental institutions. So these three departments
of Government were closely attached to faculties of commerce, maintaining at
least equal partnership with Arts. Over time, there have been powerful moves
within these commerce faculties towards a market-focussed explanation for human
behaviour and a disdain for the capacity of governments to function as efficiently
as market-driven organizations in delivering services. This has led to declining
concern for the unique character of public sector institutions. As a result,
the separate study of public administration has experienced accelerating decline.
The "vocational" appeal of public administration for students realistically
assessing their career prospects has not been sustained in this skeptical environment.
"Management" has emerged as a generic discipline, claiming to solve the ills
of public bureaucracy by adopting the nostrums of the private sector. This has
resulted in the widespread alienation of public administration from its previous
setting in political studies departments. Public sector teachers often end up
on the margins of management schools. Public policy as a study remains awkwardly
poised as a result, sitting as it does on the fulcrum between organizational
and State politics. The separation of politics from administration which was
much debated nearly a century ago has come back to haunt scholars still interested
in such matters and to damage wider understanding of the core processes of democratic
government.
Carol Johnson, Politics Department University of Adelaide
Australian political science and the study of discourse
This paper argues that the study of political discourse, in
its various forms and taking various approaches, has become an increasingly
useful aspect of Australian political science. That development, in turn, is
related to a "discursive shift", associated with the influence of neo-liberalism,
that has taken place in Australian government discourse and that has challenged
previous understandings of Australian political thought. As well, the increasing
study of political discourse has been influenced by the impact of interdisciplinary
approaches such as post-structuralist, postmodernist, feminist, queer, critical
theory and postcolonial analyses. Such analyses can generate very useful insights.
However, this paper also argues that one of the strengths of Australian political
scientists' use of discursive approaches is that they are largely seen as merely
supplementing more traditional approaches to the study of politics.
ROOM: G 008 |
PANEL: MEDIA AND POLITICS |
Chair: Marian Simms
Phil Chase, Senior Lecturer, School of Communication, Unitec,
Auckland
Hegemony in abstraction: Media coverage and
the 2001 local government election
The media are central to political communication in western
liberal democracies. All media and television in particular have
become primary sources of information allowing the public to make informed
decisions at election time. But increasingly voters are making their choices
on the basis of mediated data devoid of substance or serious analysis. In October
2001 New Zealanders went to the polls for the triennial local government elections.
This paper explores how publicly-owned national television and the regional
daily press covered and portrayed the Auckland Mayoral election. It analyses
the textand visuals of television's news and current affairs and the daily press
coverage of items on the mayoral campaign drawing on elements of content and
discourse analysis. The two media focused on differing facets of the election,
and employed divergent linguistic and visual presentation styles; yet the resulting
coverage was similar: highly segmented, trivialised, with a notable absense
of genuinely insightful discourse. Voter citizenship needs were more ably met
via the paid press advertisements, despite the initial press censorship. While
appearing to provide some measure of balanced coverage, the media focused on
story constructions which militated against voter understanding of policy platforms,
public interest issues, and reinforced negative conventional perceptions of
politics.
Andrew M Vandenberg, Centre for Citizenship and Human
Rights, Deakin University
Trade unions, globalisation, and networked computers
Many trade union movements anticipate that networked computers
constitute a means of both reversing declining unionisation densities and coping
with the challenges posed by the globalisation of national economies. Reasons
to doubt this include:
1) the individualising effects of new media;
2) a contemporary compulsion for public organisations to abandon the schooling
of responsible and active citizens in favour of networking with interactive
consumers; and
3) a tendency for global capitalism to outflank unions and de-link unions and
parties within labour movements.
Reasons to investigate the union organising possibilities of networked computers
include:
1) the potential for a post-liberal civic republicanism in the electronic mode
of information;
2) the potential for local unionists to co-ordinate their organising with other
activists in diverse social and political movements; and
3) the rise of a new internationalism among diverse groups critical of globalisation.
In light of these considerations, this article considers the Australian Council
of Trade Unions' strategic plan Unions@Work along with international research
on unions and networked computers, and argues that since networked computers
will have no uniform or sweeping effects on all agents, organisations, or people
it is likely that both market-friendly individualisation and post-liberal online
republicanism will develop at once. Some unionists will turn to networked computers
in order to gain better "customer service" while some will turn to them in order
to organise community unionism. Similarly, a propensity for globalisation to
de-link unions from national parties of labour may well combine with networked
computers facilitating the emergence of stronger linkages in the international
union movement. The doubters will therefore be right to some extent but unions
should persevere anyway and make the most of the opportunities offered by networked
computers.
Sally Young, Department of Political Science, University
of Melbourne
It is no longer possible to understand modern election campaigns
without considering election candidates' reliance on mass media and expensive
television advertising. Political advertising is now central to the conduct,
if not the results, of modern election campaigns. The ultimate purpose of political
advertising in elections is, of course, to win votes. While no researcher has
been able to conclusively determine how, many have argued that advertisements
do have an effect on voters and can even influence voting choice. Yet there
is also evidence to suggest that political advertisements have other, perhaps
unintended effects. It is alleged that they have contributed to the decline
of the political parties, the rise of a cynical electorate and the 'dumbing
down' of political debate. These are serious charges however, they have never
been comprehensively tested in an Australian context. Instead, many claims and
assumptions have been made about how modern Australian political advertising
has degenerated. It is claimed that
1) the information content of political ads has declined;
2) that political ads have become more negative;
3) that political ads have become more personalised - focusing on the party
leader instead of policies or the party; and
4) that the electioneering strategies behind political ads have changed as the
principles of political marketing have taken hold.
This paper reports the results of a comprehensive study of political advertising
in Australia. The researcher has collected and analysed over 1500 newspaper
and television advertisements from 1949-2001. Analysis of these advertisements
was performed using three complementary research methods - content analysis,
discourse analysis and ad-mapping (that is, uncovering the decisions made by
parties about when and where to place their ads as well as the frequency with
which particular ads are run). The results reveal how Australian political advertising
has changed over the past fifty years.
David Denemark, Department of Political Science, University
of Western Australia
Information flow and voter decision-making in the 2001 Australian federal
election: The role of international and domestic issues
This paper examines the role of TV coverage of international
and domestic issues during the 2001 Australian federal election campaign, and
its effects on voter decision-making. More specifically, it looks at voters'
differential reliance on the two distinct, high profile sets of issues that
dominated media election campaign coverage: the domestics issues that had been
the focus throughout the election year (especially, health, education, and taxes)
and the international issues that assumed centre stage just before the election
was called (refugees and asylum seekers, terrorism, and defence and national
security). Using an original content analysis of TV coverage, merged with the
2001 Australian election survey, interaction models yield significantly different
patterns of reliance on international and domestic for groups of voters distinguished
by the timing of their vote choice, and the level of their existing political
interest and information. Those moderately-interested voters, who largely decided
their vote choice about the time the election was called, were the most likely
to cite international issues as the key to their vote choice, while those lower
interested voters deciding just before or on election day were significantly
more reliant on domestic issues. These patterns point to a variant on Zaller's
(1989) model by showing that a single, high-intensity campaign can sustain within
it two distinct issue agendas which voters with different cognitive skills and
responsiveness to TV cues differentially utilize to inform their vote choice.
ROOM: G 009 |
STREAM: POLITICAL THEORY |
Political theory and politics II
Chair: Mary Walsh
Megan Alessandrini, School of Government, University
of Tamania
A fourth sector: The impact of neo-liberalism on non-profit organisations
Modern society has traditionally been viewed as comprising of
three sectors; government, market and civil society. The theoretical base of
three pillars of government (or polity), commerce (or market) and civil society
has historically been assumed to be a comprehensive structure of society. Many
theorists have proposed different characteristics for the sectors but until
recently none have proposed fundamental change to the structure. Debate over
civil society has been a central element of political analysis for hundreds
of years. Civil society has been variously theorised as subversive and detrimental
to society at large, as the site of social action and as a category into which
all human activity that is not market or government can be placed. In the late
twentieth century civil society has been viewed as the site of social and community
activity and more recently the activities of formal community organisations
that have become increasingly involved in the delivery of human services. It
has become evident that the traditional third sector has changed dramatically
and is now polarised: some organizations remain highly altruistic and amateur
in their structure and functions, but others have developed sophisticated and
complex modes of operation in response to the shrinking welfare dollar. A 'fourth
pillar' to the traditional tripartite separation has emerged. This fourth pillar
is that of the 'entrepreneurial civic service sector'. Organisations engaged
in one or a number of formal legally based arrangements with government and
other funding sources are now indistinguishable in many respects from market-based
organisations. They cannot however be categorised as market organisations because
they are not focussed on profit or capital accumulation. These organisations'
underlying goals are survival, growth and compliance with appropriate values.
In pursuit of these goals, organisations are achieving greater independence
through funding diversity and the implementation of managerial strategic plans
and processes. It is apparent that an additional 'pillar' provides a theoretical
base to contemporary societal structure, and more accurately reflects society
and the relationship between government and human service organisations.
Chris Geller, School of Economics, Faculty of Business
and Law, Deakin University
Single Transferable Vote with Borda Elimination: A new vote counting system
Dummett (1997) notes particular difficulties with single transferable
vote (STV) and proposes an alternative vote counting system called "Quota/Borda
system" (QBS) to remedy specific difficulties. I propose an alternative system,
structurally related to QBS, which accomplishes similar solutions but has some
significant differences. This alternative system is identical to STV in all
aspects except one. It eliminates candidates in reverse order of their Borda
scores rather than by their current ranking of first-place votes. I designate
this system STV with Borda elimination (STV-B). STV-B and QBS share general
features. They retain proportional representation from STV. However, they differ
from STV is two critical manners. First, both permit some influence on candidate
selection to occur between voting blocks. Second, they are much more stable
than STV when subjected to small changes in voter preferences. Outcomes from
STV-B differ from QBS outcomes in two ways. Under STV-B, a minority that shares
some preferences may elect a candidate even if the minority is not a solid coalition,
as is required for minorities under QBS. Further, QBS always selects Borda winners,
either for a minority or overall. STV-B may reject a Borda winner through emphasis
on each voter's most preferred candidates.
ROOM: G 010 |
STREAM: AUSTRALASIAN POLITICS |
Sandra Lilburn and Damian O'Leary, Political Science
Program, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University
The politics of conscience voting in Australia: Case studies in public deliberation
As a deliberative practice, conscience voting has far-reaching
implications for public debate. In an ideal sense, conscience voting represents
the high-water mark of deliberation, with representatives grappling with substantive
issues on their merits, in full view of the public. In a less idealised sense,
however, conscience voting permits representatives to assert their own value-bias
and interests and to conclude issues with little input from their constituencies.
By examining the political impetus behind conscience voting in three key arenas
- the Federal Parliament, political parties, and the public sphere - this paper
will illuminate the implications of this practice for democratic deliberation
and representation. Utilising several case studies where conscience voting has
been advocated, adopted, or formally rejected, the paper highlights concrete
examples through which the complexities surrounding conscience voting as a deliberative
practice can be analysed. The case studies have been chosen to facilitate an
analysis of the interactions between the Parliament, political parties, and
the public sphere. The case studies deal with a range of controversial issues
including the regulation of private sphere relations, individual rights and
freedoms, and matters of political and constitutional sovereignty. They are
cases in which the conscience vote was called for in the context of a social
controversy where a plurality of values or interests was at stake. In these
cases the relationship between publicity and deliberation can be clearly drawn.
They are all cases in which the occurrence of broad-based deliberation (within
and between the Parliament, the parties and the public sphere) has some bearing
on the legitimacy of the legislative process. The case studies are Medical
Practices Clarification Bill 1973, Sex Discrimination Bill 1983, Euthanasia
Laws Bill 1996, and the Sex Discrimination (Amendment) Bill 2000.
John Chesterman and David Tucker, Department of Political
Science, University of Melbourne
Minority rights in democratic Australia
Two recent and strongly contested political debates in Australia
have each resulted in the Commonwealth government's rejection of claims by minority
racial groups, and in each case the rejection appears to have received the overwhelming
approval of the Australian public. The two debates concerning the 1998
amendments to the Native Title Act, and the more recent treatment of 'illegally
arriving' asylum-seekers have seen a conservative Australian government,
buoyed by vociferous public support and a compliant opposition, take uncompromising
stands against what many expert commentators regarded as legitimate claims.
In this paper we analyse these debates in search of their democratic implications
for Australia, and we examine the extent to which the rejection of the claims
constitutes a new approach to minority rights in Australia.
Murray Goot, Politics, Macquarie University
Party convergence revisited
That the major parties in Australia have converged is an idea
of long standing. But proponents of the idea differ about when it happened,
why it happened and what its consequences might be. In revisiting the party
convergence thesis, this paper does three things. first, it provides a critical
examination of the assumptions that underlie the thesis; in particular, it focuses
on the widespread, if tacit, assumption that the only policies that matter are
policies in one domain typically, the economic policy domain. Second,
it casts doubt on the validity of the thesis. It argues that those who propound
the thesis generally conflate two analytically distinct dimensions of policy
space direction and distance so that shifts by the parties in
a particular direction (most recently, to the right) come to be read as a shift
in the distance between the parties (almost always, a narrowing). It shows that,
for voters at least, the parties remain distinct, not least in the positions
they might be said to occupy on a left-right dimension. Beyond that, it points
to the dearth of specific criteria, replicable measures and relevant dates.
Third, it explores some features of Australian politics said to follow from
the thesis, notably the claim that party convergence around left-right or economic
issues accounts for the growth of minor party support, including the rise of
Pauline Hanson's One Nation.
ROOM: G 015 |
ROOM: G 030 |
Stream: Australasian politics |
Richard Stanton, University of Western Sydney
Mezzanine politics
This paper examines the relationship between public opinion
and public policy in a regional Australian city and provides evidence to support
an argument that special interest groups have the capacity to escape scrutiny
from within the public sphere. It demonstrates why community or special interest
groups fail to achieve their goals and why others - which attain what I will
refer to as 'mezzanine status' - succeed politically without reference to the
Mayhewian notion of the redemption of rhetorical tokens. It follows the work
of Habermas and Mayhew presenting evidence that professional communicators have
the means of social influence at their disposal. It examines the role of the
newspaper in the determination of sociopolitics and attempts to place in context
theories of persuasion and influence as they occur at local government level.
It analyses newspaper reporting of a proposal by an organisation known as Inland
Marketing Corporation to influence local government in NSW to invest in a high-risk
low-yield scheme to develop commercial interests using taxpayer funding. It
achieves this through a content analysis of articles appearing in The Central
Western Daily, in Orange NSW, and The Australian Financial Review. The paper
focuses on the central roles played by journalists and politicians - acting
as professional communicators - in the NSW regional city of Orange in supporting
unconditionally economic development. It attempts to argue that political influence
is assisted by mass media and of greater intensity in regional areas. It examines
government financial support for the Inland Marketing Corporation based on Andsagar's
(2001) proposition that interest groups attempt to shape public opinion using
competing news frames. It provides an analysis of the political process of policy
making at local level and the precedent to invest ratepayer funds in the high-risk
low-yield proposal from the IMC. I will also attempt to show how the IMC has
defined itself in media terms through ownership of the issue of fresh 'export
produce' transport and logistics.
Peter Chen, University of Melbourne
They're not like us: The deamalgamation of Delatite Shire
The forced amalgamation of local councils in Victoria under
the Kennett government in the mid 1990s lead to a major period of upheaval and
reform across the entire local government sector. Forced into new "mega
councils" with appointed administrators and cuts to rate income, all councils
struggled to merge political and administrative systems and cultures, manage
service delivery, and move to new public management principles of contract management
and privatisation of council functions. While most municipalities grudgingly
accepted the new centrally-determined boundaries, Delatite Shire in North East
Victoria saw ongoing resistance to the amalgamation from the southern community
of Mansfield, bitterly opposed to the amalgamation with Benalla and the perceived
loss of services and government staff from the region. From the formation of
a locally-based residents association, the first democratically-elected council
of the new shire was replaced by one comprised of pro-deamalgamation representatives,
who successfully lobbied the State government for the opportunity to present
a case for splitting the Shire. Following ongoing community consultation, the
Council has been given the opportunity to split, an administrative exercise
that will increase rates and create a new shire dependent on contracted services
from surrounding municipalities. Examining the case, this paper explores the
public debate and political strategies employed to advance and realise the deamalgamation
policy, examining the problems associated with forming a community of interest
within the new shire. Overall, the case presents some interesting comparisons
with other pro-autonomy movements, the theoretical analysis of which is normally
confined to religious and ethnic separatism. The paper concludes that, while
practical limitations in effective public administration resulted from the ill-considered
merger of Benalla and Mansfield, much of the political debate surrounding deamalgamation
were based on the essential premise that separation was the only solution for
significant financial and structural problems within the council. Thus political
arguments were constrained within this 'pre-framed' debate.
ROOM: G 031 |
STREAM: INTERNATIONAL POLITICS |
States, nations and identity in international politics
Chair: Katrina Lee Koo
Ayla Göl, Department of International Relations, Australian
National University
A critique of foreign policy analysis (FPA) in transitional states
This paper will challenge the orthodox understanding of foreign
policy analysis (FPA) to demonstrate why an alternative approach to the foreign
policies of transitional states is required. There are three main criticisms
of the mainstream theories of foreign policy. The first criticism is that much
of the literature has not only been within a behavioural framework that ignores
the sociological analyses of the state but also FPA become restricted by a fetishism
of decision-making as an end in itself. Although all foreign policy analysts
did not neglect the sociological explanations about the state they have not
reached the same level of analysis with sociology and more recently historical
sociology. The second criticism against FPA is that its preoccupation with the
'big powers' and/or 'modernised/developed' states, in particular the United
States of America. After the 1960s, a need of new theories for new states has
become a subject for FPA since it cannot be separated from the main theoretical
and methodological concerns of IR. In the 1970s and the 1980s, although most
foreign policy analysts developed new models for the study of the newly emerging
states' foreign policies the level of analysis was mainly restricted to domestic
politics, interdependence and the role of charismatic leadership within Third
World literature. The third criticism is that FPA has been inadequate in explaining
foreign policy making in transitional states. In the 1990s, the debate over
internal/external, domestic/foreign, and inside/outside within the IR theory
forced foreign policy analysts to think about 'the domestic sources of foreign
policy' and its converse, 'the external sources of domestic policy'. Based on
these criticisms this paper will aim to expand the scope of FPA into post-positivism
that suggests an analysis of the relationship between national identity construction
and foreign policy making by emphasizing the role of agency and a socio-historical
structure of transitional states.
Cameron Hill, University of Queensland
Imagining imperialism: Constructivism, role theory and American
debates over the Philippines, 1898-1913
The concept of states' 'role identities' and their sources has
received much attention within recent contructivist international relations
theory. In particular, the question of whether states' role scripts are principally
drawn from 'structural' sources (international norms, social practices and interactions)
or from 'corporate' sources (domestic narratives and state-society relationships)
poses a key problem for constructivists interested in the empirical implications
of key ontological questions such as the structure-agency problem. Drawing from
official debates in the United States over the acquisition of the Philippines
in 1898-1913, this paper contends that role identities must be understood as
a product of both predominant structural and domestic norms. This is demonstrated
by:
(1) the impact of dominant international colonial norms and social practices
in structuring American debates over the Philippines question at the turn of
the century:
(2) the role of domestic narratives such as liberalism, republicanism and exceptionalism
in shaping the actual content of America's colonial policies in the Philippines.
The paper concludes by assessing the ways in which constructivist theory should
further elaborate the concept of role identities.
Chengxin Pan, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of
Arts, Australian National University
Two perspectives on self and other: Western and traditional Chinese views
of identity: Implications for global politics
Sometimes in an effort to redress the wrongs of Eurocentrism,
the claim is made that almost all Western ideas can find their counterparts
in ancient China. In International Relations, similar attempts have been made
to identify Chinese sources of what are commonly regarded as Western ideas,
such as realism, power politics, the balance of power, and nationalism. In this
paper, I want to examine in what sense this can be said about the notions of
self and Other, central themes in the development of a Western theory of international
relations. Without denying that there are commonalities between Western and
traditional Chinese conceptions of self and other, I argue that significant
differences exist between these perspectives. It is primarily because of those
differences, I suggest, that 'Western' IR theory failed to take root in China
before Western expansion into China in the nineteenth century. Moreover, I suggest
that an appreciation of traditional Chinese way of relating self to other (rather
than Other) in a non-dichotomised manner may help shed much-needed light on
how we might better interact with one another in the increasingly globalised
world.
Alan J Ward, Government Department, College of William and
Mary, Virginia
A constitution for a divided society: The problematic case of Northern Ireland
Northern Ireland has a history of constitutional development
dating to the Government of Ireland Act, 1920. This established Northern Ireland
as a constitutional entity for the first time, with devolved self-government.
The model of government used was majoritarian, and therefore inappropriate for
a divided society containing two antagonistic communities, one Protestant/Unionist
the other Catholic/Nationalist. Unionists were able to use their majority to
monopolize the Northern Ireland parliament and executive in the unionist interest
between 1921 to 1972, when the system was abolished by the UK parliament. Since
1972, Britain has been trying to devise a system of power-sharing that would
provide both communities, and all major parties, with some share of political
power.
ROOM: G 053 |
STREAM: THE POLITICS OF RESISTANCE AND CLASS |
Sam Pietsch, Australian National University
Government scapegoating of Jewish refugees in the 1930s
The quota imposed by the Australian government on Jewish refugees
in the late 1930s has always been controversial. Most historians have held that
the policy was adopted because that Australian public was anti-Semitic, and
in particular that workers objected to Jews as a source of cheap labour. The
policy is thus seen as a reflection of the racism already present in the community.
This explanation ignores the sizeable support that Jewish refugees had amongst
the community, especially as victims of fascism. On balance the press was favorable,
and the labor movement particularly anti-Semitic. The ACTU and Sydney TLC both
called for increased numbers of working class refugees. Anti-Semitism did exist,
but it was not dominant in the community. Rather, the situation was one of ambiguity,
in which strong leadership could have an important influence on public opinion.
Instead, the government deliberately reinforced racial prejudice. Repeatedly,
the government stressed that they would not allow refugees to undermine work
conditions, despite the fact that their own inquiries showed the refugees posed
no threat to workers. Anti-Semitism was not confronted by this position, but
validated, reinforcing workers' fear of refugees. Why was this racist policy
adopted? It was not a response to demands by workers. Workers were also concerned
about immigration from Britain and Northern Europe, which the government encouraged.
In fact, scapegoating of refugees was precisely designed to aid large scale
immigration. By emphasising the perceived racial differences of the Jewish refugees
an object for the fear of workers was created, distracting attention from other
immigrants. The refugees thus acted as a lightening rod for criticism of the
government, a policy which seems to have been somewhat successful. The government
therefore showed it was prepared to encourage anti-Semitism in order to fulfill
the perceived needs of capitalism for an increased labour supply.
Drew Cottle, University of Western Sydney
Helen Masterman-Smith, University of Western Sydney
Fretilin: Resistance and survival
This paper is concerned with the East Timorese organisation
Fretilin. It examines its origins and the forms of its political resistance
to the Indonesian invasion and occupation, before the UN referendum. The emphasis
of this paper will be on the early years of struggle and the transformation
of an ill-prepared organisation, based largely around the Catholic Church, into
a nationalist resistance movement. The paper considers the ideologies and actions
of Fretilin during this early period, how they have managed to survive decades
of colonial oppression, and the organisation's responses to the changing political
and economic terrain since that time. Fretilin's role in guerilla warfare, social
struggles, and later civil disobedience will be examined. This paper questions
some of the substantial gaps in our understanding of the East Timorese resistance
movement, from the standpoint of Fretilin's political and social history.
Rick Kuhn, Australian National University
The tradition of Jewish anti-Zionism in the Galician socialist movement
One of Zionism's stock tactics has been to conflate Zionism
and Judaism. Just as there are Jewish opponents of the racist Israeli state
today, there have always been opponents of the Zionist strategy for dealing
with anti-semitism. Rather than examining the largest Jewish socialist organisation
in eastern Europe, the Bund in the Russian empire, this paper considers the
attitude of its sister organisation in the Austrian Empire, the Jewish Social
Democratic Party of Galicia (JSDP). From the its first public statements, on
Mayday 1905, the JSDP emphasised its fundamental commitment to the class organisation
of the Jewish workers, solidarity with the international working class and a
commitment to class struggle. On the basis of this position, the Party explicity
rejected Zionism. Not only in programatic terms, but also in its organisational,
industrial, electoral activity the JSDP combatted the influence of Zionism and
Labour Zionism. Like the Bund, the JSDP had considerable success and rapidly
overtook the influence of Zionism in the Jewish working class.
Website maintained by Phil Griffiths. This page updated 30 September 2002